APA Promotes Misleading Thunderstorm Headline
APA-The Engineered Wood Association (APA) recently sent out an email containing the following misleading heading: Thunderstorm Twerks Texas Houses (they also feature this article on the APA homepage). Here’s how SBCA believes APA’s misdirection may impact the market:
1) This headline leads the reader to draw a false conclusion.
Take the following article as an example of something that would be very misleading if SBC Magazine took a similar approach to headlines, “APA Certified OSB is Cause of the Collapse of Multifamily Units in 85 mph Winds,” As SBC Magazine states in that article; “It goes without saying any natural disaster, like a tornado or hurricane, causes severe stress on buildings. Hence, to state in an article or even imply that OSB is the cause of a collapse is disingenuous at best (sensationalizing for promotional gain), and unprofessional at worst.”
The video attached to that article is a great illustration of the point raised in the first sentence of the APA referenced article: “It doesn't take a tornado to destroy a house.”
The problem is APA disregards the facts and tries to help the reader conclude sheathing products that compete with OSB in the market are substandard. For example, the APA is careful to pick an article that does not show pictures of OSB roof sheathing blown off of roof systems.
2) This article has a bias to achieve the marketing goal of benefiting APA-member OSB sheathing products.
This APA approach should be viewed in the context of a February 2013 statement by APA President Ed Elias in a letter to SBCA:
We (APA) believe that a major goal for the SBCA position is to provide a cost-effective engineering solution to their membership and as such this goal serves the SBCA membership well. However, by establishing standard factors in which product equivalency or system performance are applied generically, an unintended consequence may be that non-wood products (e.g. foam sheathing) gain an advantage and supplant traditional OSB market share. This is not in our Association members' best interests.
3) APA’s selective approach to covering this particular storm event creates confusion over what actually happened.
The articles written on the storm the APA references have the following headlines:
- WS: Evidence of EF-0 tornado in Tarrant County
- Third tornado confirmed in storms that walloped North Texas
- Texas Sky Ranger: Storm Damage in Rockwall, Arlington, Watauga, Keller
- This Destroyed House Proves A Severe Thunderstorm Is Just As Dangerous As A Tornado
While it is clear which article APA decided to focus on, the third article in this list actually provides a good series of photos that give the reader a better understanding of the destruction this storm caused. You can also click on the slideshow here to view all the photos.
- View Slideshow
- Photo 2
- Photo 3
- Photo 4
- Photo 5
- Photo 6
- Photo 7
- Photo 8
- Photo 9
- Photo 10
- Photo 11
- Photo 12
- Photo 13
- Photo 14
- Photo 15
- Photo 16
- Photo 17
- Photo 18
- Photo 19
- Photo 20
- Photo 21
- Photo 22
- Photo 23
- Photo 24
- Photo 25
- Photo 26
- Photo 27
- Photo 28
4) APA’s approach to publishing articles shows they have a strong bias toward marketing messages versus sound science and good engineering.
As we have published previously, an assessment of their past work might indicate that APA has one or more “conflicts of interest.”
SBC Magazine believes that a sound assessment of situations like those that happen periodically in the tornado belt include, but are not limited to:
- Was the building built to code?
- If not, what were the as built conditions?
- Which aspects of the structure were built to code?
- Which were not?
- What is the cause/effect analysis for each code compliant and each non-code compliant condition?
- Is there any possibility of being able to benchmark performance? For example:
- Does one building built identically to another perform differently?
- Why did it perform differently?
- Different winds?
- Different methods of connections?
- Different building orientation?
- Different window and door conditions?
There will be many reports on high wind event damage in the forthcoming years. Some will be credible, while others may use sensationalism to advance a marketing agenda.
The most important outcome of poor building performance in a high wind or seismic event is that no one gets hurt, the construction industry continues to learn and evolve and design and installation best practices improve. The entire construction industry will greatly benefit if everyone’s goal is to help, not hinder, those seeking building innovation and best practice improvement.
For additional information on the performance of wood structural panels, please visit the following webpage on OSB as a Raw Material and the following articles on performance of building materials in high winds and as tested.
- Tornado Season & Collapse, Are Building Materials to Blame?
- Really? OSB Sheathing Blamed in Building Collapse Due to 86 mph Wind!
- Video: U of Alabama Wood Panel Testing; Ductility Concerns
- Tornados Wreck Havoc in Mid-US, Blame?
- APA Promotes Misleading Thunderstorm Headline
- No Comment from APA on OSB Braced Condo Collapse Viral Video
- Texas Tornadoes Push Call for Changes to Building Code
- Video: Texas Tornadoes Highlight Need for Proper Wall Construction
- Building Code Compliance Suggested to Counter Tornados
- Wind Load Analysis: MWFRS vs. C&C
- Is APA a Great Example of Advancing Interests via Conflicting Interests?
- Video: OSB Sheathed Apartment Collapses in 86 MPH Winds