MiTek Promotes Framing the American Dream Study
Originally published by: ProSales Magazine — December 1, 2016
The following article was produced and published by the source linked to above, who is solely responsible for its content. SBC Magazine is publishing this story to raise awareness of information publicly available online and does not verify the accuracy of the author’s claims. As a consequence, SBC cannot vouch for the validity of any facts, claims or opinions made in the article.
Editor’s note: The article below was produced and paid for by MiTek USA for use in the publication sourced above. For more information on Framing the American Dream, go to sbcindustry.com/fad, and to learn more on how to use this information to your benefit in the marketplace, check out SBCA’s new Component Marketing Toolbox.
A recent controlled experiment in house framing conducted by the Structural Building Components Association has shown the clear advantages of framing with structural components over stick framing. Dealers offering component products who may need data to illustrate the advantages of trusses and wall panels can take note of a recent side-by-side comparison, which shows that a home built with trusses and wall panels was framed two and a half times faster than a home framed with dimension lumber.
In the comparison, two nearly identical 2,900 square foot ranch-style homes were framed using two approaches to their construction. One home was built using a “stick framing” method, and the second home was framed using components (roof trusses, wall panels, and floor trusses) that were manufactured to precision specifications, trucked to the site, and erected in a numbered sequence.
The goal of the side-by-side comparison was to see which approach to framing would take the least time, consume the least amount of wood, and require the least-skilled (and therefore lowest-cost) workers, while generating the least waste.
The results of the Framing the American Dream study were conclusive. The component-framed house required 152.1 man-hours to complete, whereas the stick-framed house required 373.5 hours. It took 250% (two and half-times) longer to construct the stick-framed home.
The component-framed house produced only 12 cubic feet, or about three 32-gallon trash cans. The stick-framed house generated 411 cubic feet, e.g. a 15-yard dumpster.
The construction was part of the Framing the American Dream project; both homes were donated to wounded US veterans.